"
A comparison of these pages shows that Nilus merely added to
Lutostansky's version the statement to be found in Butmi's version that
the political plan for the peaceful conquest of the world for Zion, was
devised in theory by Solomon and other sages _929 years before the birth
of Christ_. Lutostansky said in 1907 that "the head of the snake
represents the sages of Zion, and the body--the Judean nation," while
Nilus said that the "head should constitute the government of the Jews
initiated in the plans of the sages (always masked even from their own
people) and the body--the Judean nation." Thus the sages of Zion were
transformed by Nilus into "the government of the Jews" in order to
connect the "political plan" all the more closely with the "protocols."
The American editors have omitted this part of the Nilus epilogue,
evidently because it seemed even to them too absurd for American
consumption.
All of the literature about the "protocols" that appeared in various
parts of the world in 1920 is based on the "documents" vouched for by
the mysterious Sergius Nilus, and fortified by the irresponsible
Jew-baiter and intellectual pervert Ippolit Lutostansky.
That the Nilus-Lutostansky-Butmi campaign was just what the Tsarist
government desired may be seen from the photographic reproduction of
the letter sent to Lutostansky by Grand Duke Michael, who was regarded
as the most liberal among the Russian Grand Dukes. The letter appears
together with other letters of congratulation from members of the
Imperial family in the volume containing the passages quoted above.
Pages:
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102